Zionism Subverts Western Democracies To Facilitate The Denial Of Palestinian Heritage, History, And Human Rights
Following the end of the Second
World War, the Zionist obsession with the illusionary God-given
dreams of establishing a Jewish state with religious exclusiveness and colonial
expansion, was aided by a global sympathy induced by revelations of the nazi
death camps and the horrors of what was dubbed as the “Holocaust.” At the time
of Israel’s establishment as a state in 1948, the general consensus of opinion
was that Israel’s questionable creation had been permitted as a conscious and
wilful act of compensation — particularly by Western nations subject to
lobbying and pressure from the World Zionist Organisation (WZO) — for the
Holocaust. In 1895 Edmond James de Rothschild visited Palestine and
subsequently supplied the funds to establish the first Jewish colonies there as
part of the Rothschilds long term objective of creating its own Zionist state. The
fact that this “compensation” was going to be payed for with Palestinian land
and lives, did not appear to bother the global conscience which was
understandably but unforgivably caught up in a Holocaust hysteria feverishly
stoked and fully exploited by WZO leaders and their ideologically deluded
supporters.
World War, the Zionist obsession with the illusionary God-given
dreams of establishing a Jewish state with religious exclusiveness and colonial
expansion, was aided by a global sympathy induced by revelations of the nazi
death camps and the horrors of what was dubbed as the “Holocaust.” At the time
of Israel’s establishment as a state in 1948, the general consensus of opinion
was that Israel’s questionable creation had been permitted as a conscious and
wilful act of compensation — particularly by Western nations subject to
lobbying and pressure from the World Zionist Organisation (WZO) — for the
Holocaust. In 1895 Edmond James de Rothschild visited Palestine and
subsequently supplied the funds to establish the first Jewish colonies there as
part of the Rothschilds long term objective of creating its own Zionist state. The
fact that this “compensation” was going to be payed for with Palestinian land
and lives, did not appear to bother the global conscience which was
understandably but unforgivably caught up in a Holocaust hysteria feverishly
stoked and fully exploited by WZO leaders and their ideologically deluded
supporters.
Founding of WZO was initiated by
the Rothschild Banking Dynasty in cooperation with Theodor Herzl at the
First Zionist Congress which took place in August 1897 in Basel, Switzerland
when the “Rothschild Red Sign” was adopted as the Zionist flag that 51 years
later ended up as the flag of Israel. When it was founded, the goals of the
Zionist movement were stated in a resolution that came to be known as the
“Basel Program” with the aim of “establishing for the Jewish people a legally
assured home in Palestine. For the attainment of this purpose, the Congress
considers the following means serviceable:
the Rothschild Banking Dynasty in cooperation with Theodor Herzl at the
First Zionist Congress which took place in August 1897 in Basel, Switzerland
when the “Rothschild Red Sign” was adopted as the Zionist flag that 51 years
later ended up as the flag of Israel. When it was founded, the goals of the
Zionist movement were stated in a resolution that came to be known as the
“Basel Program” with the aim of “establishing for the Jewish people a legally
assured home in Palestine. For the attainment of this purpose, the Congress
considers the following means serviceable:
1. The promotion of the settlement of Jewish
agriculturists [farmers], artisans, and tradesmen in Palestine;
agriculturists [farmers], artisans, and tradesmen in Palestine;
2. The federation [unified organisation] of all Jews
into local or general groups, according to the laws of the various countries;
into local or general groups, according to the laws of the various countries;
3. The strengthening of the Jewish feeling and
consciousness [national sentiment and national consciousness];
consciousness [national sentiment and national consciousness];
4. Preparatory steps for the attainment of those
governmental grants which are necessary to the achievement of the Zionist
purpose.”
governmental grants which are necessary to the achievement of the Zionist
purpose.”
“Israelis and American Jews fully agree that the memory
of the Holocaust is an indispensable weapon — one that must be used
relentlessly against their common enemy … Jewish organisations and individuals
thus labor continuously to remind the world of it. In America, the perpetuation
of the Holocaust memory is now a $100-million-a-year enterprise, part of which
is government funded.”
of the Holocaust is an indispensable weapon — one that must be used
relentlessly against their common enemy … Jewish organisations and individuals
thus labor continuously to remind the world of it. In America, the perpetuation
of the Holocaust memory is now a $100-million-a-year enterprise, part of which
is government funded.”
Moshe Leshem,
an Israeli author according to whom the expansion of Israeli power is
commensurate with the expansion of the “Holocaust” propaganda.
an Israeli author according to whom the expansion of Israeli power is
commensurate with the expansion of the “Holocaust” propaganda.
By highjacking the Jewish
Holocaust, Zionism was able to cynically conflate itself with Judaism as the victim
in possession of the mainstream media’s perceived moral high ground while
simultaneously with ruthless impunity goose-stepping over Palestinian human
rights and international law. As a consequence of this control and manipulation
of the Western media storyline on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Zionist
Apartheid Israel has been able — without debate or need for substantiation — to
entrench the belief that all Palestinians and their supporters were
“terrorists” so as to facilitate global toleration of its own often barbaric
and systematic oppression of the indigenous Palestinian population.
Holocaust, Zionism was able to cynically conflate itself with Judaism as the victim
in possession of the mainstream media’s perceived moral high ground while
simultaneously with ruthless impunity goose-stepping over Palestinian human
rights and international law. As a consequence of this control and manipulation
of the Western media storyline on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Zionist
Apartheid Israel has been able — without debate or need for substantiation — to
entrench the belief that all Palestinians and their supporters were
“terrorists” so as to facilitate global toleration of its own often barbaric
and systematic oppression of the indigenous Palestinian population.
When in 1993 the Palestinian
Liberation Organisation’s renunciation of violence and recognition of
Israel’s right to exist was followed by many Arab states offering to negotiate
peaceful coexistence, the Israeli bluff became apparent through its
failure to respond in kind by instead proceeding — while masquerading as a
sincere participant — to surreptitiously sabotage any negotiations that would
lead to peace. Zionist Israel’s reluctance to have peace with its Arab
neighbours was simply in keeping with its master plan for a Land of Israel
(Eretz Yisrael) that would be devoid of any Arab Palestinians who are “not
human.” And this was from an allegedly God-chosen people who should have known
better because they were likewise described and regarded by the Nazis to whom
in retrospect they should perhaps be grateful for providing the Holocaust as
a means with which to blackmail, bribe, and bully the rest of the world into
silent acquiescence and cowed complicity in Israeli ethnic cleansing of
Palestinians and the illegal, parasitic appropriation of their land.
Liberation Organisation’s renunciation of violence and recognition of
Israel’s right to exist was followed by many Arab states offering to negotiate
peaceful coexistence, the Israeli bluff became apparent through its
failure to respond in kind by instead proceeding — while masquerading as a
sincere participant — to surreptitiously sabotage any negotiations that would
lead to peace. Zionist Israel’s reluctance to have peace with its Arab
neighbours was simply in keeping with its master plan for a Land of Israel
(Eretz Yisrael) that would be devoid of any Arab Palestinians who are “not
human.” And this was from an allegedly God-chosen people who should have known
better because they were likewise described and regarded by the Nazis to whom
in retrospect they should perhaps be grateful for providing the Holocaust as
a means with which to blackmail, bribe, and bully the rest of the world into
silent acquiescence and cowed complicity in Israeli ethnic cleansing of
Palestinians and the illegal, parasitic appropriation of their land.
Having thus been virtually
stripped of its “high moral ground” facade, Zionist Apartheid Israel —
faced with increasing global knowledge of historical realities including the
barbaric oppression of Palestinians — finally attempted to confront the
deterioration of its image by engaging in public debate but failed because
debate as a forum requires presentation of facts that are open to question,
unlike the Zionist inspired mainstream media dissemination of propaganda.
stripped of its “high moral ground” facade, Zionist Apartheid Israel —
faced with increasing global knowledge of historical realities including the
barbaric oppression of Palestinians — finally attempted to confront the
deterioration of its image by engaging in public debate but failed because
debate as a forum requires presentation of facts that are open to question,
unlike the Zionist inspired mainstream media dissemination of propaganda.
Despite pre-Israeli election and
ongoing current pronouncements by Israeli government ministers denouncing the
concept of a “two-state solution” and claiming “ . . . this land is ours. All
of it is ours . . . ” it has been business as usual for Western political
leaders whose first allegiance to an Apartheid war criminal state has remained
unwavering. Even U.S. President Obama’s feigned and much mainstream media-hyped
displeasure at Benjamin Netanyahu’s pre-election pledge of “If I’m elected,
there will be no Palestinian state” was short-lived when a few days later Obama
approved the sale of 19 “stealth” aircraft at a cost of $2.7 billion
which will be deducted from U.S. aid funds to Israel. As U.S. largesse to
Israel continues to increase to possibly as much as $4.5 billion per year
thanks to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee’s control of Congress,
some 50 million Americans are living below the poverty line with with 47
million of them receiving food stamps.
ongoing current pronouncements by Israeli government ministers denouncing the
concept of a “two-state solution” and claiming “ . . . this land is ours. All
of it is ours . . . ” it has been business as usual for Western political
leaders whose first allegiance to an Apartheid war criminal state has remained
unwavering. Even U.S. President Obama’s feigned and much mainstream media-hyped
displeasure at Benjamin Netanyahu’s pre-election pledge of “If I’m elected,
there will be no Palestinian state” was short-lived when a few days later Obama
approved the sale of 19 “stealth” aircraft at a cost of $2.7 billion
which will be deducted from U.S. aid funds to Israel. As U.S. largesse to
Israel continues to increase to possibly as much as $4.5 billion per year
thanks to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee’s control of Congress,
some 50 million Americans are living below the poverty line with with 47
million of them receiving food stamps.
So while shyster Western
political leaders are allowed to spend billions of taxpayer money to preserve
the concept of democracy — but in reality waging wars at Israel’s behest and on
Israel’s behalf — by fighting an unending “War On Terror” that obliterates
community infrastructures and murders millions of innocent civilians in Middle
Eastern countries, the taxpayers’ democratic rights of access to the true
facts, freedom of choice and speech, and the the right protest and
freedom of association are undemocratically thwarted in so-called Western
democracies by Zionist-initiated legislation that criminalises criticism,
boycott, or sanctions — as was applied against South Africa’s Apartheid —
against Israel whose Apartheid policies are far more barbaric and in violation
of many more international laws.
political leaders are allowed to spend billions of taxpayer money to preserve
the concept of democracy — but in reality waging wars at Israel’s behest and on
Israel’s behalf — by fighting an unending “War On Terror” that obliterates
community infrastructures and murders millions of innocent civilians in Middle
Eastern countries, the taxpayers’ democratic rights of access to the true
facts, freedom of choice and speech, and the the right protest and
freedom of association are undemocratically thwarted in so-called Western
democracies by Zionist-initiated legislation that criminalises criticism,
boycott, or sanctions — as was applied against South Africa’s Apartheid —
against Israel whose Apartheid policies are far more barbaric and in violation
of many more international laws.
There was no finer example of
subservient acquiescence to the Zionist Jewish lobby by Western leaders than
the vomit-inducing spectacle of them linking arms in a Paris unity rally
following the Charlie Hebdo shooting which was probably an Israeli false flag
operation designed to stem recent events including a spate of what many people
regarded as being long overdue decisions recognising the historical existence
of a Palestinian people who were deserving of justice, human rights, and a
state of their own. Such decisions — despite furious Israeli threats
accompanied by the obligatory reminders of the Holocaust — had recently
included recognition of Palestinian statehood by a number of European nations;
the provision of Palestinian observer status at the International Criminal
Court (ICC); a vote of recognition by the European parliament; and the Geneva
Conventions’ invocation of Palestinian rights by 126 countries urging Israel to
halt illegal settlement construction in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. The
Geneva Conventions which govern the rules of war and military occupation had
not on that occasion been attended by Australia, Canada, or the U.S.A. —
countries whose far from exemplary past colonial governance had included racial
discrimination, rampant exploitation, and heartless ill-treatment of indigenous
populations which in some cases could be termed as genocide.
subservient acquiescence to the Zionist Jewish lobby by Western leaders than
the vomit-inducing spectacle of them linking arms in a Paris unity rally
following the Charlie Hebdo shooting which was probably an Israeli false flag
operation designed to stem recent events including a spate of what many people
regarded as being long overdue decisions recognising the historical existence
of a Palestinian people who were deserving of justice, human rights, and a
state of their own. Such decisions — despite furious Israeli threats
accompanied by the obligatory reminders of the Holocaust — had recently
included recognition of Palestinian statehood by a number of European nations;
the provision of Palestinian observer status at the International Criminal
Court (ICC); a vote of recognition by the European parliament; and the Geneva
Conventions’ invocation of Palestinian rights by 126 countries urging Israel to
halt illegal settlement construction in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. The
Geneva Conventions which govern the rules of war and military occupation had
not on that occasion been attended by Australia, Canada, or the U.S.A. —
countries whose far from exemplary past colonial governance had included racial
discrimination, rampant exploitation, and heartless ill-treatment of indigenous
populations which in some cases could be termed as genocide.
Yet months earlier when Israel
with its usual arrogance and impunity pounded the defenceless and hapless
civilian inhabitants Gaza, not a single one of our fine upstanding defenders of
democracy and human rights had either the humanity or courage to utter one word
of condemnation. The violent murder of innocent people irrespective of who or
where they are is reprehensible as was indeed the case with the Charlie Hebdo
shooting which apparently deserved far more media attention and global
condemnation than the wanton death and destruction described in the following
link:
with its usual arrogance and impunity pounded the defenceless and hapless
civilian inhabitants Gaza, not a single one of our fine upstanding defenders of
democracy and human rights had either the humanity or courage to utter one word
of condemnation. The violent murder of innocent people irrespective of who or
where they are is reprehensible as was indeed the case with the Charlie Hebdo
shooting which apparently deserved far more media attention and global
condemnation than the wanton death and destruction described in the following
link:
William Hanna is
a freelance writer with published books the Hiramic Brotherhood of the Third
Temple and The Tragedy of Palestine and its Children. Purchase
information, sample chapter, other articles, and contact details at:
a freelance writer with published books the Hiramic Brotherhood of the Third
Temple and The Tragedy of Palestine and its Children. Purchase
information, sample chapter, other articles, and contact details at:
