British Democracy Is Dead: Long Live The Ethnic Cleansing With Impunity Of The Palestinian People By Apartheid Israel.
by William Hanna, February 19, 2016
Thanks to the Zionist hijacking of their governments, Most Western
nations are selective in their condemnation of racial
discrimination and crimes against humanity.
On
February 14th, 2016, the UK Government announced that it would be setting up
guidelines to prevent public bodies from supporting — through their procurement
and investment policies — the legal and human rights of the brutally persecuted
Palestinian people. This is despite the fact that the Boycott, Divestment and
Sanctions (BDS) campaign — similar to the sanctions tactic successfully
employed against Apartheid South Africa — is a peaceful and effective method of
forcing the Israeli Government to cease its arrogant disregard for
international law. As a followup to this announcement, the invertebrate British
Cabinet Office Minister, Matthew Hancock, dutifully grovelled his way over to
Israel — for a joint press conference in Jerusalem with that despicable racist
war criminal Netanyahu — to oblige his rapacious hosts with the view that
London supported the directive “because we believe in an open and free trade
and we believe that discrimination is not appropriate and should be stood up
to.” This pathetic excuse for a representative of the British people was
apparently oblivious of the fact that immigrant Israelis on both illegally
occupied and stolen Palestinian lands, had for almost 70 years barbarically
discriminated against the indigenous population.
February 14th, 2016, the UK Government announced that it would be setting up
guidelines to prevent public bodies from supporting — through their procurement
and investment policies — the legal and human rights of the brutally persecuted
Palestinian people. This is despite the fact that the Boycott, Divestment and
Sanctions (BDS) campaign — similar to the sanctions tactic successfully
employed against Apartheid South Africa — is a peaceful and effective method of
forcing the Israeli Government to cease its arrogant disregard for
international law. As a followup to this announcement, the invertebrate British
Cabinet Office Minister, Matthew Hancock, dutifully grovelled his way over to
Israel — for a joint press conference in Jerusalem with that despicable racist
war criminal Netanyahu — to oblige his rapacious hosts with the view that
London supported the directive “because we believe in an open and free trade
and we believe that discrimination is not appropriate and should be stood up
to.” This pathetic excuse for a representative of the British people was
apparently oblivious of the fact that immigrant Israelis on both illegally
occupied and stolen Palestinian lands, had for almost 70 years barbarically
discriminated against the indigenous population.
The
unashamed hypocrisy and double standards of most Western leaders is not a
phenomenon that evolved by chance, but is one that came about as a result of
well-financed and organised Zionist Jewish lobby groups that exist throughout
Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United States, and Western Europe. Yes,
there is even a SAIPAC (South African Israel Public Affairs Committee) in Cape
Town. Such parastatal organisations and faux-NGOs routinely exploit lawfare —
the illegitimate use of domestic or international law to discredit and
criminalise individuals or organisations — to spread propaganda and/or
influence public opinion with a view to forcing their respective countries of
residence to embrace the Israeli narrative and stifle any public debate
whenever the subject of Israel’s criminality is raised.
unashamed hypocrisy and double standards of most Western leaders is not a
phenomenon that evolved by chance, but is one that came about as a result of
well-financed and organised Zionist Jewish lobby groups that exist throughout
Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United States, and Western Europe. Yes,
there is even a SAIPAC (South African Israel Public Affairs Committee) in Cape
Town. Such parastatal organisations and faux-NGOs routinely exploit lawfare —
the illegitimate use of domestic or international law to discredit and
criminalise individuals or organisations — to spread propaganda and/or
influence public opinion with a view to forcing their respective countries of
residence to embrace the Israeli narrative and stifle any public debate
whenever the subject of Israel’s criminality is raised.
The
lawfare tactic is supported by a worldwide network of Israel’s diaspora allies
known as sayanim — local Jews in their countries of residence — who having
received email alerts from the Israeli Foreign Ministry, will take all
necessary steps to intimidate, pressurise, or simply bribe individuals in
the media and politics to adopt pro-Israel positions that are neither moral nor
in the best interests of their own countries. By distorting and suppressing any
criticism of Israel, they pre-empt the potential implementation of any
initiatives that might undermine either Israel’s economy or the world’s
perception of Israel as an innocent victim just defending itself. Needless to
say, Netanyahu — never one to miss an opportunity — drew parallels between
efforts to boycott Israel, the long history of anti-Semitism, and the
international community’s alleged anti-Israel bias. Netanyahu also emphasised
his gratitude to Britain by stating that “I want to commend the British
government for refusing to discriminate against Israel and Israelis and I
commend you for standing up for the one and only true democracy in the Middle
East.” Only democracy in the Middle East? How is that for fascist chutzpah?
lawfare tactic is supported by a worldwide network of Israel’s diaspora allies
known as sayanim — local Jews in their countries of residence — who having
received email alerts from the Israeli Foreign Ministry, will take all
necessary steps to intimidate, pressurise, or simply bribe individuals in
the media and politics to adopt pro-Israel positions that are neither moral nor
in the best interests of their own countries. By distorting and suppressing any
criticism of Israel, they pre-empt the potential implementation of any
initiatives that might undermine either Israel’s economy or the world’s
perception of Israel as an innocent victim just defending itself. Needless to
say, Netanyahu — never one to miss an opportunity — drew parallels between
efforts to boycott Israel, the long history of anti-Semitism, and the
international community’s alleged anti-Israel bias. Netanyahu also emphasised
his gratitude to Britain by stating that “I want to commend the British
government for refusing to discriminate against Israel and Israelis and I
commend you for standing up for the one and only true democracy in the Middle
East.” Only democracy in the Middle East? How is that for fascist chutzpah?
Another
recent headline-grabbing event was the interrogation by British anti-terrorism
police of a student who wore a “Free Palestine” badge and wristbands to school.
Rather than encouraging their pupils to learn about and support human rights,
teachers at the Challney High School for Boys in Luton reported Rahmaan
Mohammadi to the police for what can only be described as his commitment to the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights which starts of by categorically stating
that “all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are
endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a
spirit of brotherhood.” Supporting such sentiments in Britain is now apparently
a crime, and the teachers’ action in this case is reminiscent of the Nazi era when
the roles were reversed and schoolchildren were groomed to report any
“subversive” thoughts by their teachers, friends, neighbours, and even their
own parents. In Britain, the existence of a Zionist Thought Police is
now a reality and their suppression of free speech is killing off what little
is left of British democracy.
recent headline-grabbing event was the interrogation by British anti-terrorism
police of a student who wore a “Free Palestine” badge and wristbands to school.
Rather than encouraging their pupils to learn about and support human rights,
teachers at the Challney High School for Boys in Luton reported Rahmaan
Mohammadi to the police for what can only be described as his commitment to the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights which starts of by categorically stating
that “all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are
endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a
spirit of brotherhood.” Supporting such sentiments in Britain is now apparently
a crime, and the teachers’ action in this case is reminiscent of the Nazi era when
the roles were reversed and schoolchildren were groomed to report any
“subversive” thoughts by their teachers, friends, neighbours, and even their
own parents. In Britain, the existence of a Zionist Thought Police is
now a reality and their suppression of free speech is killing off what little
is left of British democracy.
This
latest British government directive is no doubt an effort to keep in step with
recent legislation in the U.S. where some states have made it illegal to either
divest from Israel or to promote a boycott of Israeli products. A trade pact
with Europe will also stipulate — at the instigation of the American Israel
Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) — that the U.S. is obliged to take retaliatory
action against any European country endeavouring to boycott Israel including
the West Bank settlements which the empowering legislation views as part of
Israel proper. Apart form committing $25 million to a new anti-BDS task force —
an admission of the BDS campaign’s effectiveness — Israel is also working
to create a mechanism for global internet censorship with a ban on any material
critical of its criminal policies which it has euphemistically branded as
“incitement.” Consequently Facebook and other social networking sites have
started deleting from their sites any “hate speech” or “terrorism” related
material including criticism of Israel which is of course “anti-Semitic.”
latest British government directive is no doubt an effort to keep in step with
recent legislation in the U.S. where some states have made it illegal to either
divest from Israel or to promote a boycott of Israeli products. A trade pact
with Europe will also stipulate — at the instigation of the American Israel
Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) — that the U.S. is obliged to take retaliatory
action against any European country endeavouring to boycott Israel including
the West Bank settlements which the empowering legislation views as part of
Israel proper. Apart form committing $25 million to a new anti-BDS task force —
an admission of the BDS campaign’s effectiveness — Israel is also working
to create a mechanism for global internet censorship with a ban on any material
critical of its criminal policies which it has euphemistically branded as
“incitement.” Consequently Facebook and other social networking sites have
started deleting from their sites any “hate speech” or “terrorism” related
material including criticism of Israel which is of course “anti-Semitic.”
Policing
of the internet is maintained by ever-watchful Zionist organisations including
the Zionist Federation of Australia; the Britain Israel Communications and
Research Centre (BICOM); the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs (CIJA) in
Canada; the Conseil Representatif des Institutions Juives de France (CRIF) in
France; the Zionist Federation of New Zealand; and AIPAC in the United States.
The financial and political power of such groups should not be underestimated
and their access to government policy making ensures protection of Israel which
for example in France has included legislation of hate crimes that de facto protects
Jews by limiting one’s ability to criticise Israel. This has led to a French
court declaring that a peaceful protest promoting the BDS campaign against
Israel was illegal. So much for France’s motto of “liberté, égalité,
fraternité.”
of the internet is maintained by ever-watchful Zionist organisations including
the Zionist Federation of Australia; the Britain Israel Communications and
Research Centre (BICOM); the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs (CIJA) in
Canada; the Conseil Representatif des Institutions Juives de France (CRIF) in
France; the Zionist Federation of New Zealand; and AIPAC in the United States.
The financial and political power of such groups should not be underestimated
and their access to government policy making ensures protection of Israel which
for example in France has included legislation of hate crimes that de facto protects
Jews by limiting one’s ability to criticise Israel. This has led to a French
court declaring that a peaceful protest promoting the BDS campaign against
Israel was illegal. So much for France’s motto of “liberté, égalité,
fraternité.”
All
of this reminds me of the famous and provocative poem by Pastor Martin
Niemöller (1892–1984) about the cowardice of German intellectuals following the
Nazis’ rise to power and the subsequent purging of their chosen targets:
of this reminds me of the famous and provocative poem by Pastor Martin
Niemöller (1892–1984) about the cowardice of German intellectuals following the
Nazis’ rise to power and the subsequent purging of their chosen targets:
“First they came for the Socialists, and I
did not speak out —
did not speak out —
Because I was not a Socialist.
Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and
I did not speak out —
I did not speak out —
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not
speak out —
speak out —
Because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me — and there was no
one left to speak for me.”
one left to speak for me.”
William Hanna is a freelance writer with published books the Hiramic
Brotherhood of the Third Temple and The Tragedy of Palestine and its Children.
Purchase information, sample chapter, other articles, and contact details at:
Brotherhood of the Third Temple and The Tragedy of Palestine and its Children.
Purchase information, sample chapter, other articles, and contact details at:
