New Article by William Hanna about Charlie Hebdo Attack

Who Benefits the Most From The Charlie Hebdo Attack? 
At the time when much was being
written about the John F. Kennedy assassination and false flag conspiracy
theories were abounding, one writer suggested that the best approach to finding
an answer to the question of “who killed Kennedy,” was simply to ask “who
benefited most from his death.” In his book Final Judgment: The Missing link
in the JFK Assassination Conspiracy
, historian and author Michael
Collins Piper
asserted that Israel’s motive for the assassination was Prime
Minister David Ben-Gurion’s outrage at JFK’s opposition to Israel becoming a
nuclear power, and that in his final days as Prime Minister, Ben-Gurion
commanded the Mossad to become involved in a plot to kill America’s president.
JFK’s assassination served the dual purpose of eliminating not only the threat
to Israel’s nuclear ambitions, but also the need for the tax-exempt American
Zionist Council (AZC ) to register as a foreign agent. In order to disguise its
Zionist credentials and avoid legal action, the AZC then relinquished its
tax-exempt status and morphed into the American Zionist Committee for Public
Affairs (AZCPA) before finally becoming the American Israel Public Affairs
Committee (AIPAC) which achieved and still retains total control over those
corrupt bribe-taking occupiers of the U.S. Senate and Congress.
“Israel’s Mossad was a primary (and critical) behind
the scenes player in the conspiracy that ended the life of JFK. Through its own
vast resources and through its international contacts in the intelligence
community and in organised crime, Israel had the means, it had the opportunity,
and it had the motive to play a major frontline role in the crime of the
century – and it did.”
It is
interesting — but not surprising — to note that in all the words written and
uttered about the Kennedy assassination, Israel’s intelligence agency, the
Mossad, has never been mentioned. And yet a Mossad motive is obvious. On this
question, as on almost all others, American reporters and commentators cannot
bring themselves cast Israel in an unfavourable light — despite the obvious
fact that Mossad complicity is as plausible as any of the other theories.”
Former Rep. Paul Findley (R-I11.), in the Washington
Report on Middle East Affairs.

So to continue with the theme of
false flag operations, could the attack in Paris on the editorial offices of
the so-called satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo — for whom stoking
Islamophobia has proven to be a financially viable business proposition — have
been a Mossad operation designed to stem the growing tide of support and
sympathy among people in France and other European countries for the
Palestinian aspiration of achieving independence and statehood? Israeli Prime
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had after all previously warned that “recognition
of a Palestinian state by France would be a grave mistake.” Such a hypothesis
is by no means far fetched when carefully considering the events as reported by
the Jewish-controlled mainstream media.

In his book 9/11 Synthetic
Terror: Made in USA,
Webster Griffin Tarpley asserts that there were 
four key factors required for the successful execution of false flag terror
operations: low IQ patsies, dupes and useful idiots who will take centre stage
in the mainstream media as the alleged attackers as was the case with with Lee
Harvey Oswald in the JFK assassination; professional executioners with the
means and technical capability to carry out the attack while personally
remaining unseen and shifting the blame onto the patsies; the privatised
command structure of the shadowy bankrolling instigators who cannot be
specifically identified; and the all-important ownership of the corporate media
that promotes the narrative of the useful idiots being responsible rather than
the elusive professionals.
Mossad false flag operations are
not a new phenomenon and have even included attacks against Jews and Israeli
allies who offer more than generous support including economic and military
aid. In the summer of 1954 in what came to be known as the Lavon Affair, Israel
used a group of Egyptian Jews for its Operation Susannah with a view to
planting bombs in U.S. and British-owned civilian targets, cinemas, libraries
and American educational centres. The attacks were intended to direct blame on
the Muslim Brotherhood, Egyptian Communists, “unspecified malcontents,” or
“local nationalists” so as to create sufficient violence and instability that
would induce Britain to retain its occupying forces in Egypt’s Suez Canal zone.
The plot, however, failed when the Egyptian Intelligence Service followed and
arrested a suspect whose bomb had accidentally ignited prematurely in his
pocket and a subsequent search of his apartment revealed  incriminating evidence
including the names of his accomplices.
In the summer of
1967 during the Six Day War, deliberately unmarked Israeli Air Force jet
fighter aircraft and Navy torpedo boats in a combined air and sea assault on
the USS Liberty killed 34 and wounded 170 crew members while severely damaging
the ship. Israel’s intention was to sink the ship and blame the Egyptians so as
to drag the U.S. into a war against Egypt on Israel’s behalf. Since then a
former Navy attorney who helped lead the military investigation of the attack
has categorically stated that President Johnson (LBJ) and his defence
secretary, Robert McNamara, ordered that the inquiry conclude the incident was
an accident. Retired Capt. Ward Boston in a signed affidavit released at a
Capitol Hill news conference, said LBJ and McNamara told those heading the
Navy’s inquiry to “conclude that the attack was a case of ‘mistaken identity’
despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.” Retired Admiral Thomas Moorer,
a former Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman who spent a year investigating the
attack as part of an independent panel established with other former military
officials, stated that it was “one of the classic all-American cover-ups.”
Moorer, who was chief of naval operations at the time of the attack, asked from
his wheelchair at the news conference “Why would our government put Israel’s
interests ahead of our own”? He had always believed the attack was a deliberate
act and wanted Congress to carry out an investigation.
By staging the Paris attacks,
Israel’s Mossad’s would have helped to further reinforce not only the image of
the Muslims as a terrorists who are opposed to civilised Western values such as
freedom of expression, but also the perception of their being incapable of
coexisting harmoniously within Western societies. Such reenforcement by Israel
would drive a wedge between the the Western citizen majorities and the Muslim
minorities by dissuading Western governments and citizens from adhering to
their newly discovered humanity of regarding Palestinians as the victims rather
than the aggressors as had been portrayed for decades by the Israeli elite and
the Zionist controlled mainstream media. Despite the inducement by Zionism of
rampant Islamophobia in the United States, most American citizens are actually
in far more danger of being shot and killed by their own “to protect and to
serve” racist police forces than they are by militant Islamic terrorists. In
the past racist American used to put on Ku Klux Klan white robes and pointed
hats complete with full-faced cloth masks and eyeholes before clandestinely
hanging African Americans. Nowadays they dispense with formality by just
wearing police uniforms and quite openly shooting their usually innocent
So what would Israel have gained
by masterminding the Paris attacks? To start with, in the immediate aftermath
of the shootings, the state and Zionist-controlled media sought to exploit the
fear and the confusion of the general public; it enabled claims throughout
Europe and the U.S. that the attack on the Charlie Hebdo magazine was an
assault on the freedom of the press while omitting to mention that US-NATO
State-Sponsored Terrorism is the “Number One Killer” of Journalists and that
during the latest assault on Gaza, 17 Palestinian journalists were killed by
the Israeli army so as suppress the truth pertaining to Israeli atrocities; it
enabled Netanyahu to gatecrash the Paris march while grandstanding not just as
an Israeli leader, but as the concerned leader of all Jews who would be
welcomed in Israel with “open arms.”; it provided Israel with the excuse to
announce the expansion of more illegal settlements to house the influx of more
Jews from France; it enabled European powers to announce the implementation of
police state measures with France seeking greater authority to monitor the
Internet so as to counter support for terrorist or subversive activities, and
Britain’s GCHQ being granted greater surveillance powers that would create a
“Big Brother” environment wherein criticism of Israel would be discouraged; and
it enabled the deployment of extra police and armed forces to defend Jews
against anti-Semitic attacks.
The Jewish perception that there
is widespread anti-Semitism suggests an egocentric presumption on the part of
Jews that the majority of goyim (non-Jewish people) have nothing better to do
than to preoccupy themselves with being actively anti-Semitic. By having such a
perception, Jews continue to overlook the possibility that most people do not
actually hate “Jews,” but resent the overbearing arrogance and barbaric
inhumanity of a state whose supremacist contempt for international law and
human rights is wilfully exercised in the name, and on behalf of the Jewish
people. It has to be recognised that the average person’s innate desire for
justice and human rights does not include special dispensation for Jews even if
they do like to delude themselves with the belief that they above all other
human beings were chosen by God Himself. The mainstream media-propagated view
that to demand an Israeli respect for international law and human rights
constitutes anti-Semitism and Holocaust denial is an arrogant and outrageous
double standard and an aberration to be challenged and fiercely resisted. It
follows that the inherent arrogance of Jewish exceptionalism will invite
resentment, ridicule, and resistance.
Jewish exceptionalism decrees
that Israel has the right (granted by the Holocaust) to disregard
accountability for its own actions while vociferously demanding that others
accede to its commands and wishes; a right to continue seeking Holocaust
restitution and retribution while overlooking its own responsibilities with
regard to its war crimes against the Palestinian people; a right to blackmail,
to bribe, to bully, to harangue, and to threaten as did Israeli Foreign
Minister Avigdor Lieberman — Israel “would act on dissolving the ICC” —
following the International Criminal Court’s decision to launch a preliminary
investigation to determine “whether war crimes have been committed” during Israel’s
2014 assault on Gaza; a right to misuse state and federal law to pressure
universities to restrict criticism of Israel on campus; and a right to insist
on the enactment in all countries of special legislation specifically to cover
“anti-Semitism” despite existing laws on discrimination. The following is a
“must watch” short video of Israeli facts:
Any clear-thinking and
fair-minded person would have to correctly conclude that Israel is a sick
society as was recently admitted by Israeli President Reuven Rivlin who while
referring to acts of violence perpetrated by Jews, said it was “time to
honestly admit that Israeli society is sick — and it is our duty to treat this
disease . . . I’m not asking if they’ve forgotten how to be Jews, but if
they’ve forgotten how to be decent human beings. Have they forgotten how to
Unfortunately Israel’s sickness
is of the type that infects and affects the rest of humanity and like all
plagues must be stopped before the consequence of its lethal epidemic potential
reaches holocaust proportions. The most potent remedy for this sickness is the
diaspora Jewish people themselves who must speak out unconditionally —
irrespective of criticism and intimidation by Zionist pressure groups — against
Israel’s illegal, unacceptable, and destructive behaviour. The historian and
author of The Invention of the Jewish People, Shlomo Sand, whose past
was Jewish, but who today sees Israel as one of the most racist societies in
the western world, recently explained why he does not want to be Jewish anymore.
“ . . . I would like to apologise, if
that would be of any significance, to the entire Palestinian people, throughout
the generations. For 1948, for 1967 and for everything that happened in their
wake. An apology for 1948 would not have made the state that was established
less just – it would have become more just. For the mass expulsion and for
preventing the return, for the ethnic cleansing in several districts and for
several acts of slaughter, which may be part of every war – we can and should
apologise . . . ”
Gideon Levy, Israeli journalist.
In the meantime while continuing
to point fingers at the world for its indifference to anti-Semitism and the
genocide of Jews, Zionist Apartheid Israel unashamedly exploits the Holocaust
for political gains at the expense of the ethnically cleansed indigenous
Palestinian people. Zionists have much to hide about their indifference,
even collaboration, with the Nazis and the Fascists while their fellow Jews
were being sent to concentration camps. There is no doubt that Zionist
finger-pointing serves as a smoke screen to hide Zionism’s dark past of allowing
other Jews to die, while the Zionists themselves were lobbying to rob the
Palestinian people of their country.
“Every native population in the world resists colonists
as long as it has the slightest hope of being able to rid itself of the danger
of being colonised. That is what the Arabs in Palestine are doing, and what
they will persist in doing as long as there remains a solitary spark of hope
that they will be able to prevent the transformation of ‘Palestine’ into the
‘Land of Israel.’ . . . Zionist colonisation must either stop, or else proceed regardless
of the native population. This means that it can proceed and develop only under
the protection of a power that is independent of the native population –-
behind an iron wall, which the native population cannot breach.”
Lenni Brenner (a
Jew), in the Zionism in the Age of the Dictators
“The saving of the Jews in Europe did not figure at the
head of the list of priorities of the ruling class. It was the foundation of
the State which was primordial in their eyes.”
Tom Segev (a Jew), in The Seventh Million
William Hanna is
a freelance writer with recently published books the Hiramic Brotherhood of
the Third Temple
and The Tragedy of Palestine and its Children. Purchase
information, sample chapter, other articles, and contact details at: