Liebe Leserinnen und Leser,

wir möchten Sie bitten, diesen neuen Artikel von William Hanna zu lesen und zu teilen. 

Wir von ProMosaik e.V. möchten erneut betonen, dass Israelkritik judenfreundlich ist, da der Zionismus den Antisemitismus fördert. Wir sind felsenfest davon überzeugt, dass eine gesunde Israelkritik als Zionismuskritik den Antisemitismus bekämpfen kann.

Dasselbe gilt für den Islam: eine Bekämpfung des IS im Namen des wahren Islam bedeutet ein gesunder Kampf gegen die Islamophobie. 

dankend

Dr. phil. Milena Rampoldi von der Redaktion von ProMosaik e.V.

Mass Media Blacks out Reports

As a consequence of the corporate mass media’s blackout of the
news about Israeli crimes against humanity; as a consequence of the
International Criminal Court’s cowardly disregard of crimes committed by
Israeli leaders while instead charging Kenya’s President Uhuru Kenyatta
with crimes against humanity; and as a consequence of the West’s
Israeli orchestrated preoccupation with the necessity to wage war
against ISIS (Islamic State of Iraq and Syria) — which came into being
with covert encouragement and assistance from the real axis of evil of
the U.S., Israel, and Saudi Arabia — Israel’s latest barbaric assault
euphemistically codenamed Operation Protective Edge but in reality
intended to ethnically cleanse the Palestinian people, has been quietly
and quickly forgotten.

Collective corporate mass media amnesia comes as no surprise
considering that in the U.S. alone 90% of what Americans read, watch and
listen to is controlled by just six corporations
whose combined revenue in 2010 was $275.9 billion. Furthermore, all six
of those corporations like for example Rupert Murdoch’s [not the
actual] News Corp (Fox News, Wall Street Journal, and New York Post)
have Israeli aligned global news tentacles that distort, mislead, and
even suppress the true facts. Mass media bias towards Israel is even
prevalent at the supposedly dispassionate and honest taxpayer funded BBC
where coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict requires finding “a
balance” that is in actual fact strongly tilted towards Israel.

As part of its “balance” the BBC’s director of television, Danny
Cohen (surprise, surprise), has announced plans to air a series of
special programs next year that will commemorate the 70th anniversary of
the liberation of Auschwitz. The programs are to be broadcast around
Holocaust industry Memorial Day on January 27, 2015 and will range from
interviews with survivors of the infamous Auschwitz-Birkenau camp to a
new drama about the 1961 trial in Israel of Holocaust mastermind Adolf
Eichmann who was seized in Argentina by Israeli agents and smuggled back
to Israel on an El Al airliner. Cohen’s announcement was welcomed with
“We are delighted that the BBC will be ensuring that Holocaust Memorial
Day is marked by the widest possible audience,” declared Olivia
Marks-Woldman, chief executive of the Holocaust Memorial Day Trust. The
question is have fine Jewish people of status like Olivia felt the
slightest twinge of conscience over the recent horrific images coming
from the Gaza Strip as a result Israel’s Operation Protective Edge: an operation that had Israeli Jews chanting “tomorrow there’s no school in Gaza, they don’t have any children left.”?

Such passionate racist hate can only beget hate from the victims and
global condemnation form compassionate people. But are such reactions
anti-Semitic or simply the consequence of Apartheid Israel’s incitement
to genocide of the Palestinian people who — contrary to what Israeli
Jews keep telling us — are human beings and not beasts; are a people in
their own right; and do exist on their own land with an inalienable
entitlement as follows:

Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set
forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as
race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion,
national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore,
no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political,
jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to
which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust,
non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.

Article 2, Universal Declaration of Human Rights to which Israel is a
signatory but from which it is apparently exempt from respecting
because of the Holocaust.

Will BBC viewers be watching programs at any time in the near future
that document the atrocities perpetrated against the Palestinians by an
Apartheid Israeli war criminal state that fine people like Olivia
Marks-Woldman unconditionally support? No doubt force-feeding “the
widest possible audience” of gullible gentiles with memories of the
genocide of Jews by the Nazis helps to offset current condemnation of
the equally abhorrent genocide of Palestinians by Jews.

“Israelis and American Jews fully agree that the memory of the
Holocaust is an indispensable weapon — one that must be used
relentlessly against their common enemy … Jewish organisations and
individuals thus labor continuously to remind the world of it. In
America, the perpetuation of the Holocaust memory is now a
$100-million-a-year enterprise, part of which is government funded.”

According to Israeli author Moshe Leshem, the expansion of Israeli
power is commensurate with the expansion of the “Holocaust” propaganda.

Last month the Russell Tribunal (comprised of international law
experts) announced that Israel was guilty of “incitement to genocide,”
and that Israel’s long-term collective punishment of Palestinians seemed
to be designed to “inflict conditions of life calculated to bring about
the incremental destruction of the Palestinians as a group.” Despite
that announcement of what has been obvious for decades (not short-term
occupation, but long-term extermination), the International Criminal
Court has maintained its usual avoidance of pursuing the big fish — like
Henry Kissinger, George Bush, Dick Cheney, Tony Blair, Barack Obama,
and many others including equally indictable Israeli leaders such as
Benjamin Netanyahu — while concentrating on minnows like Kenya’s
President Uhuru Kenyatta who became the first sitting head of state to
appear before the ICC on charges of crimes against humanity for his
alleged role in unleashing a wave of post-election violence during
2007-08.

Uhuru (Swahili for “freedom”) whose alleged guilt is far from being
as obvious as that of Israeli leaders, is the son of Jomo Kenyatta “the
founding father” who led Kenya from its independence in 1963 until his
death in 1978. Independent Kenya,
like most post-colonial nations, was also the beneficiary of
colonialism’s main legacy of injustice and corruption of which Jomo had
personal experience at his trial along five others accused of managing
the Mau Mau. The accused appeared before Mr. Justice Thacker, a man who
practiced his profession in the same self-serving mould as that of Tony
Blair, the war criminal “Middle East Peace Envoy.” Thacker accepted a
bribe of £20,000 (a small fortune in those days) from the Governor of
Kenya, Evelyn Baring, 1st Baron Howick of Glendale, who wanted to ensure
that Thacker would find the accused guilty. Also according to Baring,
“Every possible effort has been made to offer them [the witnesses]
rewards and to protect them but no one can tell what will really happen
when they are confronted in court by Kenyatta’s formidable personality
…” One witness did in fact subsequently recant, admit he had been
bribed, and was convicted of perjury.

After finding the accused guilty at the end of the trial, “Justice”
Thacker — who had also unashamedly asked for an honour from the Queen
but was refused — then fled the country on the first available flight.
As an aside to this tale of unbridled corruption of justice, Ngina
Kenyatta — widow of Jomo and mother of Uhuru — is the fourth richest woman in Africa
with a net worth of $500 million while the majority of Kenyans exist in
abject poverty. For most African people the only notable difference
between colonial and post-colonial rule has been the colour change of
their corrupt political exploiters from white to black.

The West’s current Israeli-inspired and U.S.-led fabricated necessity
for waging war against ISIS is not a recent development but part of a
long-established strategy promoted by Israeli sponsored U.S.
neoconservatives who ensure the constant existence of Islamic enemies so
as to justify costly and never ending wars that ultimately benefit
Israel through the destruction of surrounding Arab neighbour
infrastructures. The creation of ISIS arose from the necessity to replace the old Islamic ogre of Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda with a new one.

In March 2007, General Wesley Clark, a retired 4-star U.S. Army
general and Supreme Allied Commander of NATO during the 1999 War on
Yugoslavia, had the following to say in an interview with Amy Goodman of Democracy Now:

So I came back to see him a few weeks later, and by that
time we were bombing in Afghanistan. I said, ‘Are we still going to war
with Iraq?’ And he said, ‘Oh, it’s worse than that.’ He reached over on
his desk. He picked up a piece of paper. And he said, ‘I just got this
down from upstairs’ — meaning the Secretary of Defence’s office —
‘today.’ And he said, ‘This is a memo that describes how we’re going to
take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then
Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran.’ I said,
‘Is it classified?’ He said, ‘Yes, sir.’ I said, ‘Well, don’t show it
to me.’ And I saw him a year or so ago, and I said, ‘You remember that?’
He said, ‘Sir, I didn’t show you that memo! I didn’t show it to you.’

General Clark’s allegation is amply substantiated by recent
Israeli-inspired and U.S.-led conflicts in the Middle East and provides
proof that plans for such conflicts were already in place long before
the justification for them had even been fabricated. Such Middle East
conflicts serve to benefit Israel in three ways: the first is to
destabilise and fragment but preferably destroy surrounding Arab states;
the second is to achieve the first by getting Western nations at their
taxpayers expense to bear all the cost and do the fighting; and the
third is to have such conflicts serve as a distraction from Zionist
Apartheid Israel’s lying, cheating, stealing, double-crossing, and
killing along with all its other barbaric violations of international
law including human rights.

Concerned, decent, and responsible people everywhere must
relentlessly demand honest and impartial media coverage of the
Israeli/Palestinian conflict which must not be overlooked or forgotten
until Palestinians receive justice and reparations for the decades of
heinous crimes perpetrated against them by Israeli Jews; they must
resolutely resist the Anglo-Zionist Political Corporate Military
Industrial Empire’s voracious dependency on continual military conflict
that maintains the status quo of almost half the world’s wealth
belonging to just one percent of the population; and they must
unconditionally insist that the ICC fully fulfils its charter as
described in the Rome Statute’s Preamble by charging Israeli leaders with the crimes that everybody knows they have been guilty of committing.

Israeli Jews have every right to have a “world of their own” if they
want, but not on ethnically cleansed Palestinian land and at the expense
of goyim taxpayers.